“Your identification, please”. I hand over my passport
to the security guard of the former prison while I think of the irony of this
place, as most of its residents have been detained because they lack
identification papers. I am visiting Thomas Philip Guya (39) at the ‘Vluchthaven’
in Amsterdam, where over a hundred people with rejected asylum claims seek
refuge until they find a durable solution.
Yet, the creation of an independent South Sudanese state in 2011
complicates Thomas’ ability to return home. When new states are created, the
newly drafted nationality laws are often limited in scope, incompatible, or may
use tight deadlines. As a result, people may fall through the cracks and are at
risk of becoming stateless. Indeed, an amendment to the nationality act of
Sudan provides that those who “de jure or de facto” acquire South Sudanese
nationality automatically lose their Sudanese nationality, irrespective of a
person’s connection to either country. There are no explicit laws for
individuals who wish to retain their Sudanese nationality. This poses a particular
threat to those living outside the newly created state, as “southerners” had to
regularise their nationality status within nine months after the independence
of south Sudan.
At this point, Thomas went to see the Sudanese Ambassador in The
Hague. “I wanted to go back to Sudan, but the Ambassador of the Republic of
Sudan told me I was no longer Sudanese, because South Sudan became an
independent country”. Recently, Sudan announced that a decision will soon be
made to activate the pending four freedoms agreements, which provides freedom
of residence, movement, work and ownership in South Sudan and Sudan. Yet, there
remains a lack of political will to resolve the nationality of people who have
a connection to both Sudan and South Sudan. A curious face peeks around the
colourful sheet that hangs from Thomas’ small bedroom doorframe. “This one is
from Sudan,” Thomas explains. “We are friends, but our countries refuse to work
together. It’s all just politics”.
Ever since South Sudan set up an Embassy in Brussels, Thomas has
been trying to acquire a document to travel back to his native place, of which
he only holds vague childhood memories. Yet, the ambassador rejected him,
because he didn’t have his identification documents anymore. Thus, neither
Sudan nor South Sudan is willing to accept Thomas as its citizen. This
suggests that Thomas has become a stateless person. And as a stateless person,
you are denied one of the most fundamental rights associated with nationality:
the right to return.
Earlier this month Thomas received some hopeful news. The Embassy of
South Sudan in Brussels is willing to provide him with a laisser passer travel document which he can use to return to South
Sudan within three months of its issuance. Thomas explains that he doesn’t want
to be in the Netherlands any longer. He picks up a recent newspaper article about
the fighting in South Sudan, and continues: “…But the situation in South Sudan
is also really difficult”. It is also questionable whether Thomas will actually
be granted citizenship upon return. “Do you think I should go?” he finally asks
me. I hesitate, but respond by asking him where he feels like he belongs in the
world. He shakes his head. “There is no home for me in this world. There is
only one home, an ideal home, and it is there in my head”.
Roselinde den Boer, Statelessness Programme Research Clinic participant 2013-2014
nice..
ReplyDelete